Current Price: £7.42
Offer Price: £9.00
Expected Close: TBD
The idea was shared by Colin.
This is a rather strange merger arbitrage case in the UK.
On the 25th of February UK lender Pollen Street Secured Lending announced a preliminary takeover offer from investment manager Waterfall Asset Management at £9.00/share in cash. The largest shareholder Invesco Limited (holds 25%) is supporting the transaction. According to UK law, the buyer was required to provide a definitive offer (“put up or shut up”) until the 24th of March, however, since then, this date has already been extended 5 times with the current deadline being the 14th of July. The reason for continuous extensions is an ongoing dispute between PSSL and its investment manager PSC which is tried to block the offer and failed to provide the information necessary for the buyer to perform due diligence. Therefore, PSSL has given PSC a 12 months termination notice and is currently looking for a new investment manager.
The most recent extension notice (16th of June), stated that the search is progressing well and that the decision on a new investment manager should be announced within a few weeks. However, it seems that PSSL is still having trouble receiving the required information, so the due diligence process has been stagnating for the past 5 months. The company states that it may be not possible to resume it until the new manager is appointed (12-month termination notice suggests PSC contract will expire only in Feb’21, so potentially another 7 months of waiting).
At this time the Board has been unable to make sufficient further progress in the provision of due diligence information requested by Waterfall, in particular due to confidentiality provisions with counterparties covering a proportion of the information requested. The Board will continue to seek to progress the due diligence process but is mindful that this may take some time and may not be possible prior to the appointment of a new investment manager.
Despite all of that, Waterfall stated that it supports PSSL’s search for a new manager, and remains committed to the merger (subject to the outcome of the pending due diligence). However, the risk remains that the buyer will walk away or that the final acquisition price will be lower given the likely impact on PSSL’s portfolio from COVID lockdowns. I would expect the price amendment to be proportional to change in NAV, which I conservatively model 14% lower. This still leaves room from the current share prices.
On a more positive note, if the offer doesn’t materialize, the company is likely to be put into run-off and liquidated.
Majority of the shareholders consulted (by both number and percentage of shares held) would like to see the Possible Offer brought to the table and otherwise are minded to support an orderly run-off of the Company’s assets and return of capital to shareholders.
Given this liquidation option, I would expect PSSL to trade at not more than 12% discount to NAV (where the trust was trading at the end of 2019) and the new post-COVID NAV to stand 14% lower relative to the current one (more details provided below). Taken this into account as a downside scenario results in share price of £7.1, which is not too far below from the current levels.
Pollen Street Secured Lending
PSSL is an externally managed investment trust specialty lender investing in credit assets originated by non-bank lending platforms and other originators of specialist lending assets globally. The trust was listed in 2014 at £10.00/share and was previously known as P2P Global Investments (rebranded in 2019). Until 2017 (before PSC came into play), the company was poorly managed and overhyped on the P2P direct lending platform trend. In 2016, 70% of its portfolio was comprised of unsecured and poorly performing US customer loans. In 2017 the company announced a strategy shift and added more focus on higher quality, asset-backed, or structured loans to SMEs and real estate. The legacy portfolio has been largely run off and currently accounts for only 5% of the assets. More background on the “toxic history” can be found here.
Current portfolio (May’20):
The majority of the PSSL portfolio (structured loans – 63%) is done in a partnership with the originator, while PSSL retains a senior capital position. Whole loans (1/3rd of the portfolio) are 100% owned by the trust. Overall, the portfolio is mainly focused on UK and US geographies with some exposure to other European and Australasian markets (details on geographical exposure are limited).
So PSSL is now focusing on:
- Consumer loans (24%) – typically unsecured (and not backed by any collateral) obligations of borrowers.
- SME (25%) – the majority of this portfolio (72%) are loans to other non-bank lenders.
- Real estate (34%) – 74% of this portfolio are development finance loans to small and medium-sized real estate developers in the UK.
Although the company doesn’t define a clear cut on the secured/unsecured portions of its portfolio it seems that the majority of loans are weakly protected. Aside from the structural protection (senior capital position), most of the loans are unsecured. Only the real estate part of the portfolio seems to be secured by collateral.
This elevated risk is also reflected in the yield of the provided loans – it ranges from 5% to 15%, while half of the portfolio yields 10%+.
Despite that, the annual credit impairments seem to be rather small (and consist predominantly of consumer and SME loans):
- In 2019 – 2%
- 2018 – 4%
- 2017 – 5%
- 2016 – 1%
PSSL is employing limited leverage with net debt at 27% of the credit portfolio.
Despite exposure to SME and higher yield lending, PSSL claims that the COVID-19 effect has been limited so far:
- The strongest impact was made on the SME segment and the legacy portfolio. In March 13% of SME portfolio was put into forbearance, however, in June (May’s report) the company stated that situation is getting significantly better with the support of the government initiatives to help SMEs: “We would note that we are seeing a positive impact of the government support schemes with the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (“BBLS”) and Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (“CBILS”), in particular, providing material support to the SME’s and leading to significant refinancing activity”. The actual net effect remains unclear at the moment.
- In March, April, and May the company has written down about 7% of the legacy portfolio (over 2% each month). In March PSSL stated that it now expects elevated levels of impairment for this portfolio in the upcoming months (legacy assets make up only 5% of the portfolio).
- The company has significantly reduced new loan originations and currently focuses on cash collections. In May net investment assets were reduced by £21m (2%).
- Aside from that, the company states (although without providing much detail) that overall the portfolio is performing well and things are getting back to normal after the reopening of economies post-COVID: “The portfolio continues to perform well with significant cash collection and a reduction in the number of loans in forbearance plans. In the US portfolio, we have seen a significant reduction in the number of loans in payment plans as the economy has reopened. The loans in payment plans for the two largest consumer portfolios has reduced in aggregate by more than 50% with the subsequent payment performance being strong. The UK portfolio is starting to see the early signs of a similar trend with loans that went into a 3-month payment plan in March coming to an end in June with the majority of customers indicating that they would like to go back onto full contractual payments.”
Two of the company’s specialty lending peers Honeycomb (also managed by PSC) and VSL.L, both with fairly similar portfolios and lending profiles, also issued reports stating good performance of the lending books, minor write-offs and signs of recovery for SMEs due to governmental support.
In case the merger fails, downside will be affected by two factors.
- Eventual change in NAV due to COVID-19 impact. So far PSSL (and peers) continue issuing optimistic reports claiming limited effects on portfolio. To stay conservative, I am modeling a 10% drop in the value of the loan book (materially higher than impairments during previous years), which due to leverage translates into c. 14% decline in NAV/share.
- The discount at which PSSL trades after the merger breaks and NAV is restated to reflect the impact above. I assume this reverts back to -12% at which the trust was trading at the end of 2019. Keep in mind that the trust will be in liquidation mode, so it is unlikely the discount will be wider than that.
Putting this all together, in case the merger breaks I would expect PSSL’s NAV/share to stand at £8.1 post-COVID impact, and then 12% discount would imply £7.1 price per share.
This seems to suggest a limited downside from the current prices, however, keep in mind that my assumptions (especially on COVID impact) might be not conservative enough.
Also, there is a risk that PSC is reluctant to reveal information required by the buyer for a different reason than the wish to continue collecting ongoing investment management fees. The dispute between the board and PSC definitely raises some suspicions. Worst case scenario is some kind of fraud, but I do not think that it is likely.
Major shareholders of PSSL
- Invesco Limited (US investment manager with $1tn AUM) – 24.7%.
- Quilter (UK investment manager with £100bn AUM) – 20.15% (has increased its stake from 16.2% at the end of June’20). Also owns 28% in HONY (similar specialty lender managed by PSC).
- Pentwater Capital Management – 4.9%.
- JPMorgan Chase & Co – 5.28%.
Dispute with PSC
PSC is an investment manager (£2.6bn AUM) that specializes in specialty lending and alongside PSSL manages HONY (since 2015).
The argument between the two companies was sparked after the offer from Waterfall was received on the 8th of January. PSC states that the required information for due diligence appeared to be unusually extensive for a public takeover (which signals high conditionality) and might have involved handing over confidential and sensitive information. Therefore, PSC tried to warn the board about this but was ignored. PSC also claims that some information that was requested doesn’t belong to PSSL (PSC investment papers).
PSSL, on the other hand, states multiple agreement breaches on behalf of PSC and claims that the manager failed to send the required information (the documents that were actually sent were largely redacted and irrelevant) and withheld files, which belong to PSSL including even the asset list of the company.
PSC then tried to urge PSSL shareholders to change board, however, in the most recent AGM (30th of June) shareholders voted for the current board to remain.
Potential liquidation of the trust
In the most recent monthly update for May’20, PSSL has stated that its consultations with largest shareholders have indicated that the majority of them (both in number and count) intend to support the offer and in case it doesn’t materialize, would like to see PSSL’s portfolio getting run-off and liquidated.
No final decision has been made yet, but if the company chooses the liquidation, the whole process will take a few years “due to the Group’s investments not comprising readily realizable securities”.
Waterfall Asset Management
The buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the specialty lending industry, while PSSL seems to fit its investment strategy well.
Waterfall ($8bn AUM) runs primarily three investment strategies: high-yield asset-backed securities, loan opportunity strategy, and small-balance commercial loans. According to its website, the company is seeking to “create a considerable new issue pipeline through existing direct relationships with specialty finance companies and an expansive network of brokers.”.
I haven’t been able to find many cases of other lender acquisitions/investments made by Waterfall except this £250m investment in Divvy (Jan’19).
3 thoughts on “Pollen Street Secured Lending (PSSL.L) – Merger Arbitrage – 21% Upside”
The offer deadline date extended to the 11th of August. The support agreement with Invesco lasts until the 21st of August, however, will likely get extended as well without any problems. Regarding the search for investment manager – PSSL “is approaching the final stages of identifying a preferred successor to be appointed in due course. A further announcement is expected to be made during August”.
Several events have taken place in August and PSSL is now up 12% from the write-up price.
• 6th Aug – HONY (another specialty lender managed by PSC and trading at a large discount to NAV) made an offer for PSSL on NAV for NAV basis. Based on HIT’s and PSSL’s NAV of 1,016.4p and 948.8p as of 30 June 2020 respectively, PSSL shareholders would be entitled to receive 0.9335 HONY shares per each PSSL share. The current value of the offer stands at 711p, which is substantially below the Waterfall’s proposal and PSSL NAV. This offer is intended to keep PSSL in PSC portfolio, however, it is rather weird that the offer price is at such a wide discount to Waterfall’s offer.
• 10th Aug – PSC issued a statement saying that it has provided all the requested materials for the Waterfall’s due diligence, while some documents were retained “as they are subject to third party confidentiality clauses, and those third parties have not consented to waiving their confidentiality rights”.
• 11th of Aug – PSSL extended the deadline for the Waterfall’s offer once again – this time till the 8th of September. Both the buyer and the largest shareholder (Invesco) are still committed/supporting the offer.
• 14th of Aug – HONY provided an update stating that alongside their offer they also intend to provide a liquidity opportunity for the shareholders of the merged entity by launching a 200m GBP tender offer at a price not lower than 10% discount to NAV. Interestingly – it is also said that certain PSSL shareholders with 30.7% ownership (not including Invesco), “in principle”, support this combination with HONY.
• 14th of Aug – PSSL provided an update on the search for the investment manager – the successor to PSC will be Waterfall Asset Management (surprise!). PSSL also stated that they believe Waterfall’s proposal offers a better outcome for the shareholders and once again confirmed that in case the intended proposal won’t go through, the company will be put into run-off: “The Board believes that Waterfall’s appointment would also materially increase the likelihood that a firm all-cash offer will be brought to the table for shareholders to consider.”, however, if not, then it believes that Waterfall will manage the run-off better and at a lower cost to PSSL.
PSSL now trades at 832p, way above HONY’s offer and the market seems to give relatively high chances that Waterfall will proceed with the offer at original terms. However, the offer is still conditioned and will depend on due diligence. At the moment it is not clear at which stage the due diligence process is currently at (PSSL also claimed that they’ve provided most documents a few months ago). COVID impact is also unclear, but to me, the odds of Waterfall reducing the price after the DD seem quite possible. Even if it does proceed at the original terms, its unlikely to be completed before Q1 2021. The remaining upside stands at only 8%, so unless you expect that some kind of an intense bidding war starts between these parties, this seems like a good opportunity to secure the 12% profit.
PSSL is up 15% since the write-up price and I think it is time to take the money off the table (remaining upside <6%).
Despite the due diligence matters moving forward, there is a risk that the original offer priced at £9.00/share will not prevail given the potential impact from COVID on PSSL business. Moreover, with Waterfall becoming the new investment manager, the chances of it pulling the offer altogether have significantly increased.
If Waterfall buy PSSL at £9.00/share and liquidates it at NAV (948p as of June), the approximate return on this investment would stand at £35m. Whereas, if Waterfall continues to manage PSSL for another 2 years, they would earn somewhere around £30m assuming previous unchanged management fees + performance fees, which stood at £13.8m/year + according to the PR above, they will get another £2m before March'21.
Thus the actual difference between the two options here seems to be only £5m and that is only if you assume that PSSL NAV will remain unchanged. Therefore, it seems quite likely that either acquisition offer will be lowered or there will be no offer at all.