Current Price: £1.514
Offer Price: £1.50 (expected to be increased)
Expiration Date: TBD
A short note on a potential bidding war situation for a UK drug developer/manufacturer. Our knowledge on pharma CDMO industry is limited, however, the credibility of the bidders, the successful operational restructuring of the target company, and protected downside have set this up as a heads I win, tails I don’t lose much situation.
UK’s drug development and manufacturing company (inhale therapy) Vectura has received two bids from financial and strategic buyers. The board has initially agreed with Carlyle’s £1.36/share cash offer at the end of May. Scheme document had already been dispatched and court/shareholder meetings were supposed to take place on the 12th of July, however, these were adjourned as on the 9th of July Phillip Morris International upped the bid to £1.50/share (around £1bn+ equity value, 13.4x adj. EBITDA’20, 7.5x PE’20). On the same date July 9th Carlyle responded that it is currently considering its options and will make an announcement in due course. Apparently, the market expects Carlyle to raise the price – shares jumped 3% above PMI offer and now trade slightly above the bid. The situation offers a low-risk option play on an increased bid from Carlyle or even a subsequent bidding war.
Both buyers are highly credible and have deep pockets. Since 2016 PMI is expanding into products beyond tobacco and nicotine and in Feb’21 announced an ambition to generate $1bn net revenue from Beyond Nicotine products by 2025 with respiratory drug delivery as a key focus. This month, the company has also announced an $820m acquisition of Fertin Pharma (gums, tablets, and solid oral systems for pharma applications). PMI expects Vecture to become the backbone of PMI’s inhaled therapeutics business. Overall, PMI intentions look very firm, and even if a competing bid doesn’t materialize, the downside stands protected at 1%.
Vectura is a provider of inhaled drug solutions. Until a few years ago, it was focusing on developing its own treatments for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, after a few setbacks and failures with its own candidates, the company began changing its business model to contract development and manufacturing company (CDMO) in 2019. So the company now focuses not on developing its own drugs, but on providing development and manufacturing services for its partners (includes some major pharma players) and receiving IP royalties on the product sales. In essence, CDMO is a much more stable but lower-margin business. This business model shift is still ongoing, but so far the results seem great – VEC signed 18 new CDMO contracts in 2020 (including for 2 Phase 1/2 and a few late-stage drugs), royalty revenues increased 32% YoY after a few partners candidates received approvals and adj. EBITDA increased 41.7% (partly due to lower R&D investments). The company expects CDMO revenues to triple in 2021 (I guess it refers to development services revenue, which constituted 6% of total revenues in 2020). The positive changes didn’t go unnoticed by the major players and the company became a takeover target earlier this year.
Worth noting that in 2018 there were rumors that GSK is in talks to buy VEC at £1.75/share price, however, this was before its asthma candidate failure later on in November that year.
5 thoughts on “Vectura (VEC.L) – Bidding War – Upside TBD”
New Carlyle [email protected], but VEC.L trading around 164p atm (https://www.sharesmagazine.co.uk/news/market/LSE20210806150002_4071333/Offer-by-Murano-Bidco-Limited).
New PMI bid @165p, a bidding war is on!
We might see an interesting and rare bidding auction process if the bids are not finalized by tomorrow evening.
Carlyle declared their 155p bid final. No auction!
Interesting article in the Economist on the already closed PMI / Vectura merger:
“On September 20th Philip Morris International (PMI), a giant cigarette-maker, announced it had convinced over three-quarters of the shareholders in Vectura, a British pharmaceutical business, to back its takeover plan. Thus a maker of inhalers designed to combat respiratory diseases will soon be fully owned by a firm whose products often cause them.”
“Ultimately, nobody disagreed that the outcome was for owners of the stock to decide. Even that might have derailed the creation of a pharma-tobacco group, given the presence on Vectura’s share register of many fund managers whose bosses trumpet their stakeholderist tendencies. Plenty make money peddling funds that specifically exclude tobacco, and rarely lose an opportunity to paint themselves as visionaries looking beyond just profits. But if a high-minded portfolio manager held out from handing over his Vectura shares to pmi on moral grounds, he has been hiding behind a thick pile of glossy reports about the importance of ethical investing.”