Logan Ridge Finance (LRFC) – Dividend Reinstatement – 30% Upside

Current Price: $25.8

Target Price: $33.5

Upside: 30%

Expiration Date: TBD

Press release

This idea was shared by Dan.


Logan Ridge Finance (previously Capitala Finance) is a small, underperforming BDC, which trades at the second widest 40% discount to NAV vs 4% premium for peer average. The company was valued around its book value pre-COVID, however, after the dividend suspension in Q2’20 the stock lost its attractiveness to yield-seeking BDC investors and the spread widened substantially. Last month Logan Ridge transitioned to new investment manager, Mount Logan, which is an affiliate of BC Partners ($40bn AUM). It already has a track record of turning around a similarly sized BDC (PTMN, which trades at 18% discount to NAV) and intends to apply the same framework to LRFC. Mount Logan emphasized that it will make the reinstatement of dividends a top priority. The turnaround process and, especially, dividend reinstatement should act as a strong catalyst for LRFC re-rate closer to its NAV of $45/share.

Following the closing of the transaction, we envision concurrently repositioning the portfolio to drive a higher portfolio income as well as addressing the near-term debt maturities – with the clear objective of returning to paying a dividend in the near term

An example of an impact a dividend policy has on BDC companies can be seen in HCAP case. HCAP was a similarly sized BDC that was recently acquired by PTMN (the merger was covered on SSI). During the COVID outbreak in April’20 HCAP deferred its dividend payments, which (alongside pandemic impact) tore the discount to NAV from 20% to almost 80%. The gap remained at that level until the payment of the deferred dividends was announced on the 24th of November, which promptly doubled the stock price in 1 week and narrowed the discount from 70% to 30%.

At the moment, there are only 5 BDCs that do not pay dividends and 4 of them rank as having the highest discounts to NAV:

lrfc bdcs 1

The only peer that trades at a lower valuation (61% discount) is SVVC, which is a smaller and terribly mismanaged BDC with a much riskier portfolio, no dividend payments since 2014 (except 1 tiny distribution in 2018), and entrenched manager, who recently “blocked” 2 shareholder attempts to either liquidate the fund or terminate its investment manager.

Mount Logan intends to reinstate LRFC dividends by rebalancing the portfolio (more on this in the next section) and exiting non-interest-bearing equity investments (31% of the portfolio). This process has already been started by the old management and 2 out of 27 equity investments were sold in May’21. Another one was sold by the new manager in July. The expertise and comments from the new management suggest that the disposal of other equity investments should be swift:

Executives are focused on reducing equity in Capitala’s portfolio over the next year, with a material decrease showing in the next two or three quarters.

The key question here is the earnings power of the rebalanced portfolio and what yield/share price can be expected after the dividends are reinstated. I am targeting $33.5/share price which is 25% discount to NAV (somewhat wider than PTMN’s 18% discount) and my back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that at this price the rebalanced portfolio would support the same 10% yield as PTMN.

Aside from that, there could also be another longer-term special situation play embedded here – potential LRFC acquisition by PTMN. Over the last two years PTMN has been successfully rolling up smaller BDCs. Given a similar portfolio composition of both BDCs, it makes sense to think that BC Partners could drive larger synergies with LRFC and PTMN as a single entity. Management so far hinted at positioning LRFC as a BDC roll-up platform similar to PTMN, however, once the portfolio turnaround is finalized the merger between two entities could also be expected.


Portfolio rebalancing

The external manager change was announced on the 21st of April. The presentation can be found here. The transition was completed on the 27th of July.

The new manager, Mount Logan, intends to implement these changes:

  • Reposition the portfolio by exiting equity investments and focusing on high-quality debt.

Going forward, we intend to focus LRFC on investments in high quality, senior secured debt investments with the goal of delivering consistent, sustainable earnings over the long term.

  • Repay $70.6m SBA debt a large part of the current debt and refinance the remaining debt (most of it matures on May’22). The manager states that comparable funds managed by BC Partners borrow at around L + 2.75% vs. the current L + 3.5% of LRFC existing credit facility (not used yet).
  • Focus on larger deals – $10-$50m EBITDA vs $4.5m-$30m EBITDA currently, up to $100m investment size vs $75m currently:

It is our belief that a BDC focused exclusively on the Middle Market lending space will lead to better long term performance, a more stable NAV and a better trading multiple.

  • After rebalancing and reinstating dividends, pursue growth through acquisitions:

Focus on scaling the vehicle via strategic transactions – similarly to what management has done with the PTMN platform, where NAV grew from $143.7mm to $216.3mm – in order to narrow the trading gap.


Potential earnings of the transformed portfolio

While this is a bit of a theoretical exercise and assumes that equity investments will be liquidated at current BV, it shows that, at the target share price of $33.5 (i.e. 20% discount to NAV) portfolio earnings could easily support 10% dividend yield (same as PTMN). The average yield of debt-focused BDCs is actually 8%, so I am targeting for LRFC to trade worse than the average.

As of Q1’21 LRFC investment portfolio value stood $258m, out of which $80m was in equity investments. The debt part of the portfolio is quite mature with around 50% of loans due in 2021-2022. Since Q1’21 around $32m debt investments matured or were sold (here and here). The remaining legacy debt portfolio size is around $150m. The legacy debt portfolio yields close to 11% for around $16m in annual investment income.

After the company converts $80m of equity investments and repays $71m of SBA debt, the cash balance will stand at c. $100m (including the current cash balance of $60m and the above mentioned $32m of debt investment maturities). Assuming this cash gets reinvested into first/second lien debt at a more conservative 8.5% yield, the company would generate c. $9m of incremental annual income. So the total net investment income from the legacy and the new debt portfolio should amount to c. $25m.

On the expense side, I am only modeling savings on the interest expenses due to the planned repayment of SBA loan as well as the refinancings of the remaining notes. This would bring interest expenses down to $6m (excluding deferred financing fees) from the current $9.2m. The base management fee remained unchanged at 1.75% of gross assets, which translates into $4.3m expense (based on $250m portfolio assets). SG&A is also likely to remain relatively unchanged at around $5m per year. This brings total expenses after the refinancings are expected to be $15.

Summing up the two leaves $10m in distributable income or $3.7/share.

Of course, these are just basic back on the envelope calculations and the actual portfolio rebalancing will be much more complicated, however, given the track record, comments and plans of the new manager to focus on larger deals gives some confidence here.


Logan Ridge Finance

The company IPO’ed in Sep’13 and until recently was managed by Capitala Investment Advisors. The sluggish capital allocation, subpar size, high leverage and relatively large portfolio part in non-interest-bearing equity investments made sure that historically the company underperformed its peers and the market in general.

Historically, the company used to trade at a 10%-20% discount to NAV, except for the period of 2017-2019, when the company was facing certain investment performance issues and the portfolio looked much worse than now.

LFRC historical performance:

lrfc historical 1lrfc historical

The sharp drop in the share price and P/NAV in 2017 was driven by the poor Q2’21 results unveiling a growing list of problematic loans, the default of 6 loans (10.4% of investment portfolio), and concerns over future dividend coverage. Since then the company has been working through these issues, focusing on stabilizing its portfolio by growing first-lien debt investments and increasing the quality of its investments. The efforts gave fruit, which were reflected in the company’s valuation – in the H2’19 and first months of 2020, the company caught up with its peer valuation levels and traded around NAV.

Portfolio split by investment performance expectations as of Q1’21 vs Q2’17:

lrfc rating newlrfc rating old

Note: 1 – performs above expectations, the capital gain is expected; 4 – below expectations, loss of some or all principal is expected.

Investment portfolio as of Q1’21:

lrfc portflrfc first lien

Equity investments (private):

lrfc equity

Note: CIS Secure Computing and Xirgo Technologies have already been sold in May. Rapid Fire was sold in July.


The new investment manager

Mount Logan, the new manager, is an affiliate of BC Partners, an alternative investment manager with $40bn AUM. BC Partners operates two business divisions – BC private equity investments and a credit investment platform, BC Partners Credit ($4.2bn AUM, includes Mount Logan and PTMN).

BC Partners became the investment manager of PTMN (previously KCAP Financial) in early 2019. It promptly refinanced PTMN debt, rebalanced the portfolio by focusing on first-lien debts, which went from 31% to 79% of the portfolio, and getting rid of collateralized loans. PTMN also made 3 acquisitions – OHAI, GARS and HCAP – quickly liquidating substantial amounts of the targets’ assets (62% of OHAI portfolio was realized in 1 year, 34% of GARS portfolio in 1 quarter since the acquisition). In the end, PTMN ROE increased significantly and the discount to NAV narrowed down from 37% (announcement was made in Dec’18) to the current 18%. PTMN now trades at a better valuation than pre-COVID, whereas LRFC discount remains very wide.

BC Partners Credit is led by Ted Goldthorpe (also the CEO of PTMN), who was previously the president of Apollo Investment Corporation – one of the largest US BDCs –  CIO of Apollo Investment Management and CIO of the sub-advisor to CION Investment Corporation.

lrfc ohai gars

lrfc ptmn



10 thoughts on “Logan Ridge Finance (LRFC) – Dividend Reinstatement – 30% Upside”

  1. Dan, I am not sure if you had a chance to listen to the earnings call on this past Monday. Everything sounded quite rosy on the call except for the fact that they quickly glossed over the drop in NAV over the quarter to $41 from near $45……..what are your thoughts on this?

    • Timing is one of the uncertainties of this trade as Logan itself stated that “Focus on returning to paying a regular, consistent dividend in the near term”.

      Seems that the market expected either better earnings, a dividend reinstatement, or both. NAV at $40.67/share, so still a 40% discount at current prices.

    • Once Mount Logan completes repositioning most of the investment portfolio and deleverages the balance sheet, I don’t see why LRFC should trade at a significant discount to NAV or sector average.

      Mount Logan (and BC Partners Credit) has good reputation, and the whole BDC sector seems to have turned around in terms of market sentiment (and yield hungry investors seem to be chasing them again).

      So it’s not like we are investing in some unloved sector or dealing with management with poor/shady track record.

      If we have to worry about something, maybe some unknown issues and potential losses from the legacy assets.

  2. Some thoughts on LRFC quarterly results. Mount Logan so far had only two months since becoming investment manager at the end of July. And with that in mind I think portfolio rebalancing is progressing really well.

    At the end of Q2 LRFC had $89m (at cost basis) invested in Second Lien Debt and Equity+Warrants. I assume these are the parts ML needs to exit before reinstating the dividend. By Q3 this figure declined to $68m or 24% reduction. Judging by limited disclosures these exits were done at around carrying value.

    If portfolio rebalancing progresses at current rates, I would expect dividend reinstatement some time in H1’22, with some kind of announcement likely with year end results.

  3. I have exited LRFC position fully. Thesis kind of remains the same, but I am disappointed by limited progress so far and I think the upside scenario is lower today.

    – the liquidation of the equity part of portfolio is moving very slowly, equity and warrants portion went from $68m to $64.7m since Mount Logan took over management of the vehicle.
    – the yield on current debt portfolio is much smaller now, than at the time of the post – this significantly cuts size of any potential dividends.

    Using current yield of 9.3% i arrive at $18.5m in interest income (assuming the whole of equity investments are converted into debt, which might take ages). Less $5m in interest expense (assuming $40m cash will be used to further reduce debt), less $3.5 management fee (assuming total assets are reduced by cash/debt repayment), less $4m other expenses leaves only $6m for potential distributions. That is only $2.2/share in potential distributions in the ideal scenario. More realistic case is around $1.7/share in distributions, and that is probably at least couple years into the future. This is very different compared to $3.7/share in distribution I had modelled before – mostly due to lower yield on debt portfolio. While my calculations might be off, I no longer think there is material upside here or a clear cut way to reach it.


Leave a Comment